Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Judge
Although I concur in the Court’s treatment of the issue of standing and the Court’s decision to affirm Judge Evans’ denial of Plaintiff’s motion to amend its complaint, I am unable to concur in its decision to affirm Judge Gregory’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff. As a result, I concur in the Court’s decision in part and dissent from that decision in part.
As the Court notes, the extent to which Judge Gregory’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant should or should not be affirmed hinges upon whether the contractual provision requiring Defendant to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chappell v. RothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Northington v. MichelottiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Fisher v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Connor v. HarlessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.