Legal Opinion

Westburne Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Design & Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 13, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

This appeal by the plaintiff Westburne Supply, Inc. (Westburne) from summary judgment granted in favor of the defendants Diversified Design and Construction, Inc. (Diversified) and its surety, Safeco Insurance Company of America (Safeco) involves an interpretation of Arizona’s “Little Miller Act,” Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 34-221 — § 34-226. The act, as amended in 1984, requires a subcontractor to provide an initial estimate of costs within twenty days of commencing to supply labor and materials along with a notice of any remaining unpaid balance within ninety days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Asbestos Co. v. TGK Const. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hoyle v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Weitekamp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Reichenberger v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office v. YbarraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC v. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Arizona State Democratic Party v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Arizona State Democratic Party v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API