Legal Opinion

Crossen v. Wasco County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Wasco County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Lord, O. J.:

The respondent, as plaintiff, brought his action against the appellant, as upon account, to recover fees alleged to have been earned by him as sheriff of the county of Wasco, and which were chargeable against the county. The items of the demand are set forth in the complaint. ' It is also alleged that the bills specified were presented to the county court, and payment thereof demanded, and that the county court “refused to audit, allow or pay” the same, or any part thereof, except certain items specified in the complaint.

The inquiry presented by this appeal is as to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fahie v. LindsayOregon Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mackenzie v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Creason v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Frankl v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Feehely v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API