Frankl v. Bailey
Oregon Supreme Court
From Lake: W. C. Hale, Judge*, Mandamus by Adolpb Frankl against Harry Bailey, county treasurer, to compel tbe payment of warrants. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by Messrs. G. A. Coggswell, W. A. Wilshire, and E. D. Sperry. For respondent there was a brief and an oral argument by Messrs. L. F. Conn and Austin S. Hammond.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolvebton
This is a proceeding by mandamus against the treasurer of Lake County, Oregon, to compel him to pay three certain county warrants issued by the clerk upon the order of the county court. The alterna-' tive writ contains a separate count upon each warrant, identical in form, but involving claims for different amounts, the first of which is, in substance, as follows: That on July 7, 1896, the defendant was, ever since has been, and now is, the treasurer of Lake County; that on June 27, 1890, W. T. Boyd presented to the county court for said county, then sitting as a board of commissioners for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nelson v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hall v. Inhabitants of HoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Goldsmith v. Baker CityOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Crossen v. Wasco CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Union County v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Morris v. City of SheridanOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Bailey v. Malheur Irrigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Tingwall v. King Hill Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Feehely v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.