Rush v. First Nat. Bank of Amarillo
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.
In this cause appellee the First National Bank of Amarillo was the plaintiff in the trial court and the appellant, J. W. Rush, was the defendant, and W. H. Fuqua, the other appellee, was the intervener.
The appellee bank sought judgment against appellant, Rush, on a note for $12,000 executed the 26th day of March, 1906, providing for 10 per cent, interest and the usual 10 per cent, attorneys’ fees, and also for the foreclosure of a lien upon what is designated •in this suit as the Gid Jowell notes, six in number, amounting in the aggregate to $20,-000, and which constituted a vendor’s lien…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Continental National Bank v. WeemsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- De Leon v. Manuel Trevino & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1878
- Spencer v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- First National Bank of Amarillo v. RushTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Christie v. First State Bank (In Re Keener)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- Chowning v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Allison v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Lane v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.