Legal Opinion

Continental National Bank v. Weems

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1888No. 2371PublishedCited by 68 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

On the nineteenth day of December, 1885, William R. Baker, as president of the City Bank of Houston, and one of its largest stockholders, and the Houston Insttrance Company, another stockholder, filed a petition in the dis .rict court of Harris county against certain of its creditors and other stockholders, alleging its insolvency, and praying for the appointment of a receiver and for the collection and distribution of its assets among the holders of claims against it according. to their respective priorities; and on the same day appellee Weems was appointed receiver…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Peak v. EllicottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Harrison v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Stoller v. CoatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Independent District v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Skiff v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Whitcomb v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Capital National Bank v. Coldwater National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Heid Bros., Inc. v. Commercial Nat. Bank of HutchinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API