Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. Taylor

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1959No. 34961PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

The Hertz Corporation brought a damage suit in the municipal court of Chicago against George L. Taylor, a nonresident. The suit was commenced by garnishment in aid of attachment under the provisions of section 21 of the Attachments Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957, chap. 11, par. 21.), the writ being served upon the Alcoa Steamship Company, as garnishee, at its office in Chicago. Upon special appearance and motions by the defendant and the garnishee, the cause was dismissed for want of jurisdiction over the person. The plaintiff appeals directly to this court, constitutional questions having been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People ex rel. Klokke v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Booz v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Insull v. New York World-Telegram CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  3. Gerald Lindley v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. Radosta v. Devil's Head Ski LodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. City of Monmouth v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API