Legal Opinion

Mera-Hernandez v. U.S.D. 233

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 24, 2017No. 112760Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,760 LETICIA MERA-HERNANDEZ, Appellee, v. U.S.D. 233, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. For purposes of the Kansas Workers Compensation Act, K.S.A. 44-501, et seq., "workman," "worker," or "employee" means any person who has entered into the employment of or works under any contract of service or apprenticeship with an employer. 2. The Workers Compensation Act is substantial, complete, and exclusive, covering every phase of the right to compensation under the Act and of the procedure for obtaining such compensation. Consequently, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. In Re the Marriage of TrasterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Douglas v. Ad Astra Information Systems, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Fernandez v. McDonald'sSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Ætna Life Insurance v. SwayzeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API