Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Rowley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Vanderburgh Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

The appellant was the plaintiff below; his complaint contained two paragraphs. The first was based *57upon an award; the second was for one-half the cost or value of a partition-wall.

The defendant answered the first paragraph of the complaint in fifteen paragraphs; each attacking the award, and setting up facts to impeach it, of mistake, misconduct, and fraud of two of the arbitrators, the plaintiff, and his attorneys: as to the second, he answered, setting up the award in bar.

A demurrer was sustained to a part, and overruled as to a part, of the paragraphs of the answer to the first paragraph…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stipp v. Washington Hall Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1841

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tobin v. McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hill's Adm'r v. Huckabee's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Boyett v. Standard Chemical & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Fisher v. Denver National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Teneycke v. LeshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API