Legal Opinion

Boyett v. Standard Chemical & Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1906PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. H. A. Píoarge. Tliis was an action begun by attachment at the instance of appellee on certain notes executed by appellant to appellee covering the sales Of fertilizer. The complaint contained several counts declaring on the notes and other counts on the common counts.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Covington Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. H. A. Píoarge. Tliis was an action begun by attachment at the instance of appellee on certain notes executed by appellant to appellee covering the sales Of fertilizer. The complaint contained several counts declaring on the notes and other counts on the common counts. The defendants answered by pleas as follows: (1) The general issue; (2) not indebted; (3) want of consideration; (4) failure to procure license from the commissioner of agriculture to do business as a fertilizer dealer; (5, 6,7, 8) were no tags; (9, 10) that the fertilizers…

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This was an action commenced by attachment on promissory notes, given for commercial fexdilkers. Common counts were afterwards added, and various questions and exceptions raised thereon, and finally the general charge was given in favor of plaintiff on the counts based on the notes, and judgment rendered for plaintiff (appellee).

A motion is made by appellee to strike the. bill of ex-' ceptions for failure to comply with rule 33, subd. 5, circuit court (Code 1896, p. 1201). While there are. some portions of the testimony which might- have been shortened, yet the greater part of that to which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hodges v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Caldwell v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Hooker v. HubbardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Hill's Adm'r v. Huckabee's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Dickson v. McLarneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aetna Ins. v. HannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Bromberg v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Ellis v. BatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Marx v. LiningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Brown v. FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API