Legal Opinion

George v. Synkinetics, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 20, 2013No. MICV201203253DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Krupp, Peter B., J.

This action is before the court on a motion to dismiss by defendants Synkinetics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Santo P. Pasqualucci (“Pasqualucci”) (docket #15), and a separate motion to dismiss by defendant Carl J. Yankowski (“Yankowski”) (docket #13). Both motions are filed pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). After hearing on March 13, 2013, for the following reasons, each of the motions is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. In light of the fact that it took the court more than four months to schedule the motions to dismiss for hearing, the court includes in its order new…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. VaradianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Wiedmann v. Bradford Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API