Legal Opinion

State of Indiana v. Stultz, Receiver

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1935No. 26,252PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoll, J.

—The State of Indiana filed its claim with the receiver of the Wells County Bank for a preferred claim, and judgment was rendered allowing said claim as a general claim, but denied it preference. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled and this appeal was duly perfected, assigning as error the action of the court in overruling its motion for a new trial, for the reason therein assigned, that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

It appears from the record that the state board of finance of the State of Indiana had duly and regularly designated the Wells…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Independent District v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Myers v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. State v. ThumIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Montgomery v. SparksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. County Commissioners v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Hamden v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. City of Dalhart v. ChildersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1937
  3. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Citizens State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Shirk, Trustees v. Davis, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API