Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1995No. 93-50561, 93-50608, 93-50562 and 93-50609Published

1DissentReinhardt, Circuit Judge

with whom PREGERSON, WIGGINS, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, join, and with whom O’SCANNLAIN, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, join, except as to Part TV:

I dissent from the refusal to rehear this case en banc. While I agree that there is no prejudicial error that requires reversal of the convictions, I believe that the panel seriously erred in vacating the downward departures ordered by Judge Davies. In my opinion, the district court acted well within its discretion in sentencing the defendants to prison terms below the Guidelines range. Sergeant Koon and Officer…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Mirna Rivera, United States v. Robert AdamoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Robert Alton Harris v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Joe Garza-Juarez and Esteban Garza-Juarez, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Edward X. MondelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API