Legal Opinion

Alalunga Sport Fishers, Inc. v. County of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1967No. Civ. 8110; Civ. 8111PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.

In each of two actions, the appeals in which have been consolidated by stipulations made at the time of oral argument, the owner of a sportfishing vessel of more than 50 tons burden recovered judgment for repayment of taxes assessed, levied and collected by the County of San Diego and the City of San Diego. The county and the city have appealed from the judgments.

The appeal in case No. 8110 was from the judgment in favor of the owner of “Alalunga”; in case No. 8111, from judgment in favor of the owner of “Betty Lou.”

What is said herein with regard to “Alalunga” applies equally to 11 Betty…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Santa Fe Transportation Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Sullivan v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Estate of MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Sullivan v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Hotel Del Coronado Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Smith-Rice Heavy Lifts, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Favalora v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API