Legal Opinion
TAURUS IP, LLC v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 3, 2008No. 3:07-cr-00158PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
This civil action for patent infringement was filed on March 20, 2007. On February 25, 2008, I granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs infringement claims filed by the Chrysler and Mercedes-Benz defendants after I found that defendants’ products did not infringe plaintiffs United States Patent No. 6,141,-658 (the '658 patent) and that certain claims of the '658 patent were invalid as anticipated. At the same time, I denied in part plaintiffs and third party defendants’ motion for summary judgment on defendants’ breach of…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taurus IP, LLC v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Parallel Iron LLC v. NetApp, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Gutierrez-Valencia 091102 v. Corizon Utilization ManagementDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020