Legal Opinion

City of Richland Hills v. Bertelsen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1987No. 2-86-024-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURDOCK, Justice.

Appellant, the City of Richland Hills, appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and entry of partial summary judgment for appellee. The summary judgment motions arose from appel-lee, Keith Bertelsen’s, action for a declaratory judgment seeking to invalidate the city’s claim to property owned by him.

We affirm as modified.

Appellee purchased the real property described below from Frank C. Campbell, for $30,000 cash:

Lots A-L inclusive, Block 53, and Lots A-K inclusive, Block 44, Long Addition to the City of Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Russell v. City of Bryan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  2. CKB & Associates, Inc. v. Moore McCormack Petroleum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  3. Fletcher v. Minton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Mann v. Old Republic National Title Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. Bertram Hill v. City of Horn Lake, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API