Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Burnquist v. District Court Second Judicial District

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1918No. 21,085PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Upon the relation of J. A. A. Bnrnqnist and W. E. Rhinow, the supreme court granted its alternative writ of prohibition, directed to the district court for Ramsey county and the judges thereof, commanding them to refrain from any further proceeding against relators in a proceeding for contempt in that court.

Read the full summary

Upon the relation of J. A. A. Bnrnqnist and W. E. Rhinow, the supreme court granted its alternative writ of prohibition, directed to the district court for Ramsey county and the judges thereof, commanding them to refrain from any further proceeding against relators in a proceeding for contempt in that court. The facts leading up to the proceeding in contempt are stated at the beginning of the opinion. • Order No. 17 of the Minnesota Public Safety Commission recited that the sale of intoxicating liquors, as it was being conducted in the village of Blooming Prairie, was interfering with the…

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The district court of Ramsey county was ordered by this court to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not issue directing said district court and the several judges thereof to refrain from proceeding as for contempt against the relators, the Governor and the adjutant general of this state. The respondent, the Honorable Frederick N. Dickson, makes a return in his own behalf, and in behalf of the court and the other judges thereof, except the Honorable Haseal R. Brill who returns that he is disqualified from sitting in the case.

From the petition and the return of respondent Dickson the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. People Ex Rel. Broderick v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Cooke v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Kinsella v. EberhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Birkeland v. ChristiansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Smith v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Holm v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Bemis Bro. Bag Company v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API