Legal Opinion

Brannan v. Mobley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1929No. 6968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial is insufficient winch complains of the admission in evidence of testimony of an attorney at la.iv, over the objection, “that, if the witness was employed as an attorney at law to represent” the movant in a prior suit to which the testimony in question related, the “witness is incompetent, under § 5860 of the Civil Code, . . to testify.” The rule contained in this code section is founded on the relation of attorney and client, and lias no application where that relation does not exist. In order to get the benefit of the rule, the objection should state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Adkins v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Winkles v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Rainey v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Elliott v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Reece v. McCormackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Hatcher v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API