Rainey v. Whatley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. A ground of a motion for a now trial, complaining of the admission in evidence, over stated objections of Hie movant, of certain documents which are neither set out literally or in substance in the motion nor attached thereto as exhibits properly identified, but are merely referred to in the motion in general terms as being “all set out in the brief of the evidence in this case for complete reference to them as to what they show,” presents no question for adjudication. Ford v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co., 140 Ga., 670 (2) (79 S. E. 576) ; Perry v. Monroe, 150 Ga. 26 (2) (102 S. E. 356).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ford v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Baxley v. BaxleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Shingler v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Lawson v. ProsserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brannan v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Hester v. Muscogee Motor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Wright v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940