Legal Opinion

Basa v. Pierz Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1929No. 27,321PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Plaintiff and her husband, William Basa, lived on a farm in Morrison county. The portion with the buildings was their homestead. It was acquired by joint funds. The title was in plaintiff’s name. On April 20, 1925, defendant issued a policy to plaintiff, which, by modification, insured her against loss by fire in the sum of $1,000 on the dwelling and $400 on the contents thereof, which were jointly owned by plaintiff and her husband. The policy, through its by-laws, provided that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Banner Laundry Co. v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Collins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Kludt v. German Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Tyree v. Virginia InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Horsch v. Dwelling House Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. SciandraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Retail Systems, Inc. v. CNA Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. National SEC. Fire and Cas. Co. v. MinchewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Northern Assur. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API