Legal Opinion

People v. Thomasula

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Balio, J.

The issue before us is whether the reversal of defendant’s conviction is required where the prosecution acquires the cooperation of a witness by entering into an unauthorized plea bargain and where the court refuses to inform the jury of the illegality of the bargain and that it may consider such illegality as affecting the witness’ credibility. We hold that, in the circumstances of this case, defendant’s conviction must be reversed and the matter remitted for a new trial.

I

The defendant and Richard Pantano were indicted on two *128counts of criminal sale of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. SavvidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. People v. BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. BartleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. People v. ThomasulaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. RiveraNew York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API