People v. Thomasula
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Balio, J.
The issue before us is whether the reversal of defendant’s conviction is required where the prosecution acquires the cooperation of a witness by entering into an unauthorized plea bargain and where the court refuses to inform the jury of the illegality of the bargain and that it may consider such illegality as affecting the witness’ credibility. We hold that, in the circumstances of this case, defendant’s conviction must be reversed and the matter remitted for a new trial.
I
The defendant and Richard Pantano were indicted on two *128counts of criminal sale of a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. SavvidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- People v. BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BartleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. ThomasulaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. RiveraNew York Supreme Court · 2006