Legal Opinion
Abdi v. Department of Employment & Economic Development
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 27, 2008No. A07-0945PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
By writ of certiorari, relator challenges the decision of the unemployment-law judge (ULJ) that he was not eligible for extended TRA benefits because he was not enrolled in full-time remedial training. Because we hold that the United States Trade Act of 1974 and its regulations do not require participation in full-time remedial training in order to receive extended TRA benefits, we reverse.
FACTS
Relator Alaa I. Abdi was born in Somalia, moved to Yemen in 1986, and moved to Minnesota in 2000. In Minnesota, he worked for IBM and then Celestica until it ceased doing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Continental Hydraulics Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Nelson v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012