Legal Opinion

Continental Hydraulics Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 2013No. A12-1654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*299OPINION

BJORKMAN, Judge.

Relator challenges the unemployment-law judge’s (ULJ) calculation of its unemployment-insurance (UI) tax rate, arguing that the ULJ erred by transferring a portion of the predecessor employer’s experience-rating history to relator after determining there is substantially common management or control between the employers. We reverse and remand to DEED for recalculation of relator’s UI tax rate.

FACTS

Continental Machines Inc. (CMI) is a Minnesota corporation. In 2011, CMI agreed to sell its hydraulics division to Duplomatic Oleodinamica, an Italian company. Duplomatic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Colorado Division of Employment v. Accord Human Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delphi Automotive Sys., L.L.C. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Jamesway Construction, Inc. v. David W. Salyers, P.E. (Dissenting)Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API