Legal Opinion

Babcock v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1944No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 42,453PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Defendant city of Grand Rapids is a municipal corporation with a home rule charter which vests all legislative and administrative power in a city commission. The latter in turn appoints a city manager, who is charged with the administration of the municipality under the direction and provisions of the city commission. He has the power to appoint and remove all subordinate officers and employees of the city. Appointments must be made upon merit and fitness in compliance and in accordance with the civil service provisions of the charter. The charter provides that:

“No employee * * * shall be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. J. G. McCrory Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Manufacturer's Freight Forwarding Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Public Welfare Commission v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fouse v. VandervortWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Fricke v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Doyle v. KammeraadMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In Re Doyle's Application for Reinstatement in Grand Rapids Police ForceMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. City of New York v. City Civil Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API