Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Wagers

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1986No. 16197PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to decide whether a district judge abused his discretion by dismissing a civil action for lack of prosecution. We hold that he did not.

The pertinent facts are undisputed. Mildred Nagel suffered an injury to her knee during a two-car collision on or about October 19, 1981. The other driver, David B. Wagers, appeared to be at fault. Mrs. Nagel and her attorney contacted Wagers’ insurance company. Settlements were reached on Nagel’s claims for property damage and for temporary loss of the use of her automobile. However, her claim for personal injury was not settled.

Whi…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kirkham v. 4.60 Acres of Land in Vicinity of InkomIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jensen v. DohertyIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ellis v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Systems Associates, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Crawford v. Pacific Car & Foundry Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Gerstner v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API