Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Pacific Car & Foundry Co.
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided May 4, 1987No. 16669PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by PACCAR, Inc., from an interlocutory order denying its motion to dismiss the complaint in a civil action, or to quash the service of process, on the ground that the summons and complaint were not served within one year after the summons was issued. We affirm the order.
On August 3, 1983, the plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that Theron Crawford had been injured on August 3, 1981, by a machine designed, manufactured and sold by the named defendants. The machine was described as a “DART,” used for moving and stacking logs in the wood products…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. HallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Shelton v. Diamond International Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Rudy-Mai Farms v. PetersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bartlett v. PeakIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Full Circle, Inc. v. SchellingIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hoopes v. Deere & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Johnson v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hoopes v. Deere & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990