Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Werner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1928No. Appeal 19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

Albert B. Conrad brought this action in assumpsit against Edward H. Werner, the appellant, to recover an amount due on a quantum meruit, for services ren dered as a journeyman printer and typesetter. The plaintiff died and Lydia E. Conrad, his wife became executrix and was substituted. The case came for trial and Mrs. Conrad testified to the amount claimed to be due for the services of her husband, using as a memorandum without objection a calendar on which he kept his accounts. Upon cross-examination, she was asked, “Do you remember having a conversation with Mr. Werner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. GraumanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Germain Fruit Co. v. Thomas Roberts & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Hepworth v. HenshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berliner v. SchoenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Com. of Pa. v. ShultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Lyons v. Gantz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API