Legal Opinion

Berliner v. Schoenberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1934No. Appeal 155PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The Schoenberg Leather Company, having judgment against A. Berliner, Inc., caused a levy to be made on certain chattels as the property of the defendant when Jennie Berliner made claim to the goods. A rule for an interpleader was made absolute.; the claimant filed a statement of claim, and the Schoenberg Leather Company, execution plaintiff, replied with an affidavit of defense. The issue having been thus framed, the case was called for trial and the jury found for the plaintiff in the execution, and claimant has appealed to this court now complaining of a refusal of her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RaccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Commonwealth v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Stout v. RasselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1798
  4. Marshall v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Commonwealth v. DoeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Butler v. Flo-Ron Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. GrimmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Commonwealth v. AlenskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API