Com. of Pa. v. Shultz

Pee Curiam,

Defendant was convicted of having unlawfully accepted, received and appropriated money from the proceeds of the earnings of Alice Ponner, a woman engaged in prostitution, knowing thé money to have been earned by the said Alice Ponner in the practice of fornication, and without giving any valuable consideration in return therefor, contrary to Section 3 of the Act of April 24, 1931,3?. L. 52. She has appealed to this court and assigns three grounds of complaint.(1) There was evidence in the case from which the jury might find that one William Moore rented from the appellant two rooms…