Legal Opinion
Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. Levee
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 26, 1934No. 32634PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ODOM, Justice.
Putnam & Norman, Inc., relators here, filed suit against Lucius P. Levee on a claim amounting to $641.22. Defendant answered, denying the alleged indebtedness, and prayed for trial by jury. The court ordered the jury in accordance with the prayer and fixed the amount of the bond to toe given by the defendant at $200. Section 13, Act No. 135 of 1898.
The case was tried on May 25, 1933. The jury failed to agree, and the court ordered a mistrial. On June 8, 1933, counsel for Putnam & Norman, Inc., asked that the case be refixéd for trial on June 22, 1933. The judge ordered the case…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riccobono v. KearneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Paul v. TabonySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Lavoy v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State ex rel. Hirsch v. Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. AlwesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- City of Baton Rouge v. KiperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. LeveeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Rapides Cent. Ry. Co. v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Anderson Post Hardwood Lumber Co. v. BullockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.