Legal Opinion
City of Baton Rouge v. Kiper
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1957No. 4479PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
Applying to the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, Art. 7, Section 2, La.Const., LSA, Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. Levee, 179 La. 180, 153 So. 685, defendant’s application for writs of certiorari, review, and mandamus is based upon the action of the Court below in recalling a previously issued order of appeal and in refusing to grant defendant either a devolutive or suspensive appeal herein. Hearing was held on the rule issued by us under our supervisory jurisdiction ordering the respondent court to show cause why the relief prayed for should…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lafayette v. FarrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Mount Olive Baptist Church v. New Zion Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Dickerson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. LeveeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Meyers, Whitty & Hodge, Inc. v. Popich Marine Const.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Williams v. Credit Service CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Boyce MacH. Corp. v. Interstate Paving Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.