Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hirsch v. Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1887No. 9847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

^^PPLICATION for Prohibition, Mandamus and Certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

This is a proceeding against a district judge and a justice of the peace, charging the former with usurpation of authority and the latter with denial of justice.

The relatrix complains that the district judge lias issued a prohibition, forbidding the justice from trying a suit instituted before him, by her, the object of which was to prevent a third party from taking possession of a house of which, she claims to be the owner.

She further complains that she has called upon said justice to proceed with the trial of said suit; hut that he…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. LeveeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Keegan v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Dunn v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Carre v. International Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Blanks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API