Tom Yarcheski v.Keiser School, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing plaintifiy'appellant, Dr. Tom Yarcheski’s (“Yarcheski”) amended complaint. The district court dismissed Count 1 of the amended complaint, which contained a claim for breach of contract, because Yarcheski’s employment contract expressly provides that it is an at-will agreement and does not imply continued employment for a set period of time.
Because this is an appeal from a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal, we review de novo the district court’s order, drawing all the facts from the amended complaint, accepting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sierminski v. Transouth Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Lanfear v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Ironworkers Local Union 68 v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Freeman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Everette Freeman v. Cassandra SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013