Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rs
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
427 So.2d 182 (1983)
Geraldine SMITH, Petitioner,
v.
PIEZO TECHNOLOGY AND PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATORS, and Old Republic Insurance Company and Southern Fire Adjusting Company, Respondents.
No. 62194.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 3, 1983.
Donna L. Bergh of Walker, Buckmaster, Miller & Ketcham, Orlando, for petitioner.
Bernard J. Zimmerman and William G. Berzak of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, Orlando, for respondents.
EHRLICH, Justice.
The First District Court of Appeal has certified to us that its decision in Piezo Technology v. Smith, 413 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), passes upon questions of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- DeMarco v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- DeMarco v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- WR Grace and Co. v. Geodata ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.