Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz Tapia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 2002No. 98-35897PublishedCited by 230 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

Juan Sanchez-Cervantes appeals from the district court’s denial of his initial petition for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Sanchez-Cervantes argues that his conviction and sentence for federal drug violations should be vacated because of the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey1 and because he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We hold that the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively on initial collateral review, and Sanchez-Cervantes’ counsel did not render ineffective assistance. Therefore, we…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by230 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Washington, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. People v. De La PazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. United States v. Gary Lee SampsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005

225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API