Legal Opinion
Kasprzak v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 9, 2005No. 3:04CV7314PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Janice Kasprzak has filed a complaint for hostile work environment sexual harassment, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against defendant DaimlerChrysler (D/C) as well as a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Theodore Stelmaszak.
Pending is defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion will be granted as to the retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against the Company and denied as to all other claims.
Background
Kasprzak…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Thomas E. Bowman v. Shawnee State University Jessica J. JahnkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blackburn v. Shelby CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Moling v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011