Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Koelsch

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1955No. 8252PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

Plaintiff filed his application in this court for a writ of mandate. He seeks to compel defendant to grant a stay of a certain order of the Commissioner of Law Enforcement suspending plaintiff’s license to practice medicine and surgery for a period of fifteen months. An alternative writ of mandate was issued. Defendant filed a motion to quash the alternative writ and filed an answer by way of return to such writ. A hearing has been held and the matter is now before us for determination.

By the application of plaintiff for wi'it of mandate, the following facts are made to appear:

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Brainard v. Coeur D'Alene Antimony Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Grattan v. PihlbladSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. State Ex Rel. Sweeley v. BraunIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Frederic P. Holbrook, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Mitchell H. Hewitt, Bunkrupt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. State v. TribeIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Swanson v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Madison v. J.I. Morgan, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API