Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Burbank Board of Realtors

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1968No. Civ. 32112PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ third amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

In a third amended complaint plaintiffs allege among other things that they are, and were, individually members of the Burbank Board of Realtors (hereafter referred to as Board), that they were doing business as brokers and salesmen, that they had invested many years and thousands of dollars in the development of the business which had been highly profitable and gave promise of being more so in the future: that the Board is a nonprofit…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Willis v. Santa Ana Community Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ezekial v. WinkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Middlebrook-Anderson Co. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Gaston Board of Realtors, Inc. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API