Legal Opinion

Re v. Wells Fargo Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1969No. Civ. 24759PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (H. C.), J.

This is an action seeking specific performance by the lessees Angelo and John A. Re to exercise the option contained in the lease granting the lessees the right of first refusal to purchase the leased premises. We have concluded under the following facts that the judgment declaring plaintiffs ’ right to exercise the option should be affirmed.

The plaintiffs Angelo Re and John A. Re, as lessees, and Pearl K. Lannin, as lessor, executed a lease agreement whereby plaintiffs leased certain real property located in San Jose consisting of a supermarket plus the right to use (with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Wyoming National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Okun v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Amann v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dillingham Commercial Co., Inc. v. SpearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Northwest Television Club, Inc. v. Gross Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Erich v. GranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API