Legal Opinion

Eason v. Heighton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1937No. Civil No. 3723PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

In 1932 M. W. Eason, of Jenldntown, Pennsylvania, plaintiff, owned a ranch property and some live stock in Santa Cruz county, Arizona, which he listed with H. E. Heig’hton, defendant, a licensed realtor, of Tucson, Arizona, for sale. In October of that year defendant, Heighton, received from one W. W. Hodgman, Jr., whom he had contacted as a purchaser or prospective purchaser of said property, $500 as part payment of the purchase price, as he contends, but, as contended by plaintiff, Eason, as an advance on an option to buy said property. Later on Hodgman paid $500 more on the same terms and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Andrade v. AndradeArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lockett v. DrakeArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. County of Pinal v. HeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Tennery v. TenneryArizona Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Realty Associates v. Valley National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Blaine v. StingerArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Campbell v. MahanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Shun v. Hospital Benefit AssociationArizona Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API