Legal Opinion
Field v. Loveridge
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Branch; Yaple, J. Bill by Sidney Field, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Serephina A. Tucker, deceased, and Hiram A. - Tucker, sole legatee under said will, against Henry C. Loveridge and Mary Ellen Allen, to enforce a lien upon land. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
Prior to October 21, 1862, Augustus P. Tucker was the owner of 160 acres of land, which was occupied and used by him as a farm. On that day he and his wife, Serephina A. Tucker, deeded such lands to *221their son Hiram, one of the complainants in this suit, and at the same time took back from Hiram a bond in the following form:
“The condition of this obligation is such that, if the said Hiram A. Tucker, his executors or administrators, does allow, permit, and protect the said Augustus P. Tucker and Serephina A. Tucker in the free, exclusive, undisturbed, quiet, and peaceable possession of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ludeman v. HirthMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Snyder v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Elsey v. J. L. Hudson Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Stringer v. Stevens' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Colling v. McGregorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Dewey v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Kaiser v. KaiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.