Ludeman v. Hirth
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error. Tlie facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The declaration in this case was defective, in that it did not set forth the estate which the plaintiffs claimed. Iiow. Stat. § 7797. No demurrer was interposed, but the defendant pleaded the general issue, with notice of the statute of limitations, and a claim fox improvements. Hpon the trial, plaintiffs asked leave to amend their declaration, setting forth the estate claimed. The court refused to permit the amendment. Thereupon, plaintiffs asked leave to submit to a nonsuit, which was also denied, and the court directed a verdict for the defendant.
The plaintiffs claimed title under an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jerome v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dewey v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Field v. LoveridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Deaton v. HollingsheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Kolodziejczak v. BakMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Brown v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.