Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Kaiser
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Codd (George P.), J. Bill by Helen S. Kaiser against Titus J. Kaiser for a divorce. Prom an order adjudging defendant guilty of contempt for failure to comply with the. decree respecting alimony, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Prom an order adjudging defendant guilty of contempt of court, entered July 9, 1919, he has appealed. The order in part:
*661“And it further appearing to the court that the decree of divorce in the above-entitled cause was signed and filed on the 15th day of March, A. D. 1909, providing for the payment of two dollars ($2.00) per week as permanent alimony until the further order of this court. And it further appearing to the court that the said defendant has wholly failed and neglected to comply with the decree of this court and has failed to pay any alimony since the 15th day of March, A. D. 1909.
“…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carpenter v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Ripley v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- McCullough v. McCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Dewey v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simmons v. SimmonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Rybinski v. RybinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Bennett v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Wadler v. WadlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- McNair v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.