Legal Opinion

Lee v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 19, 2011No. C 09-02176 SIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS in part the motion by defendant Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and real party in interest Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (collectively “defendants” or “MetLife”), and DENIES plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was a recruiting coordinator at Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. Administrative Record (“AR”)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rabbat v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  2. Gallupe v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs. Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  3. Bigham v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
  4. Anderson v. Liberty Mutual Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
  5. Bunger v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API