Legal Opinion
Rabbat v. Standard Insurance
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 1, 2012No. Case No. 3:11-cv-1146-SIPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1313FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SIMON, District Judge.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) provides that an ERISA plan “participant” may bring a civil action in federal court “to recover benefits due to him under the terms of his plan, to enforce his rights under the terms of the plan, or to clarify his rights to future benefits under the terms of the plan[.]” 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). Plaintiff Richard Rabbat (“Mr. Rabbat”) brings this action to challenge the decision made by Defendants Standard Insurance Company (“The Standard”), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gallupe v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs. Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Reetz v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Anderson v. Liberty Mutual Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Gorbacheva v. Abbott Labs. Extended Disability PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.