Ashkar v. New York State Liquor Authority

—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated State Liquor Authority rule 36.1 (q) (9 NYCRR 53.1 [q]) based on disorderly conduct in his premises and the area adjacent to his premises (charge 1) is not supported by substantial evidence. The record contains no evidence of disorderly conduct in petitioner’s premises. Although there is evidence of disorderly conduct in the area adjacent to the licensed premises,…