Legal Opinion
Murray v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner contends that the determination that he made numerous unlawful sales of alcoholic beverages to minors (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 [1]), permitted his premises to become disorderly on two occasions (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 [6]) and engaged in improper conduct demonstrating his unsatisfactory character and lack of fitness to hold a license (9 NYCRR 53.1 [n]) is not supported…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ligreci v. HonorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Dark Horse Tavern, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- S.T.A. of Fredonia, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ashkar v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oneonta Water Street, Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Buffalo Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Continental Room, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008