Legal Opinion
Playboy Club v. State Liquor Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1969PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
An administrative agency is, of course, the sole arbiter of issues of fact but the questions posed by this appeal are, first, whether the findings made by the State Liquor Authority are, “ on the entire record, ” supported by substantial evidence (see, e.g., Matter of Holland v. Edwards, 307 N. Y. 38, 44; Matter of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam, 304 N. Y. 65, 71-72; Matter of McCormack v. National City Bank, 303 N. Y. 5, 9), and, second, whether, if some of the Authority’s findings are sufficiently supported, the facts found justified its conclusion that there had been a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Claim of McCormack v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Migliaccio v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by35 opinions
- Albany Manor Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Collins v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re 47 Ave. B. East Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bars R Us, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- La Vigna Restaurant Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.