City & County of San Francisco v. Lux
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for city and county taxes, and the case is brought here for review upon the judgment roll alone.
*482The facts of the case as shown by the findings are substantially as follows: —
Jacob Rosenberg and the defendants are the executors of the will of Michael Reese, deceased, who died in Europe in 1878, being at the time of his death a resident of the county of San Mateo, in this State, where, on the 5th of September of the same year, his will was admitted to probate by the Probate Court of that county. -
Letters testamentary upon the will were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Falkner, Bell & Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People v. WhartenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Great Southern Life Insurance v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Mackay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Smiths' Cash Store v. First Nat. Bank FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Gulf, O. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. City of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- MacKay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.