Legal Opinion

People v. Whartenby

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourteenth District, County of Nevada. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCeockett, J.

The defendant is, and was at the time he was assessed for the taxes in contest, a resident of Nevada County, and was the owner and holder of certain unsatisfied mortgages made by persons residing in the City and County of San Francisco, upon real estate situate in said city and county, to secure an indebtedness to the defendant for money loaned *464and let at interest, amounting in the aggregate to $112,000. The mortgages contained a provision to the effect that the mortgagors were to pay all taxes levied or assessed upon the sums loaned. The defendant was assessed in due form in Nevada County…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Falkner, Bell & Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. People v. NilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Florer v. SheridanIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Ferris v. KimbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Taggart v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API